Previous: Up: Developers GuideNext:

Message Monitor Architecture

As stated in the overview, several patterns exist to address common integration problems that arise with enterprise application architecture. These design patterns have been grouped in a category called enterprise integration patterns, or EIP. The first definitive EIP book describes over 60 integration patterns and problem sets addressed by each. Apache Camel is an open source set of Java libraries that implements all 60+ patterns, plus a vast number of ever increasing converters and end point connectors.

Monitoring Aggregator

The message monitor is built on the aggregator pattern. In its raw application, an aggregator combines multiple messages into one single message. As messages flow into an aggregator, they are continually combined into one message using using three distinct rule based components:

The message monitor naturally builds on each of these concepts to track messages for delivery notification completion. The correlator component determines what messages should be combined together. For notification message, all messages are correlated back to the original (sometime called 'parent' in the Direct RI) message id. The aggregator component creates a simple collection of correlated messages and their attributes and places this collection into the aggregated message body. It also keeps track of when the notification process started for timely delivery purposes as an attribute on the Camel message envelope. The completion condition determines if all notification messages have been received for the original message. In Camel, release conditions may have an al timeout attribute that indicates that the aggregated message should be completed with whatever has been aggregated up to that point.

At its heart, Camel is a highly configurable rules and processing engine where the process is defined by a "route". Routes are defined by utilizing a Camel domain-specific language (DSL). Routes are generally written directly in Java code (or some other JVM language like Scala and Groovy), or can be defined using Spring XML configuration files. For message monitoring, the aggregator is defined using the Spring based DSL and declaring each of the aggregator components in the Spring configuration XML file. The aggregator is just part of a Camel route which include an entry endpoint (from) and an optional exit endpoint (to). The following is a example Spring XML based Camel route utilizing the monitoring aggregator components.

  <camelContext xmlns="">  
    <template id="msgMonitoringProducerTemplate" defaultEndpoint="direct:start"/>
    <route id="direct-reliable">
      <from uri="direct:start"/>
           <redeliveryPolicy maximumRedeliveries="-1" redeliveryDelay="200" collisionAvoidanceFactor="0.15"/>
      <aggregate strategyRef="aggregationStrategy" ignoreInvalidCorrelationKeys="true"
          <method bean="aggregationStrategy" method="isAggregationComplete"/>
          <method bean="aggregationStrategy" method="getAggregationTime"/>
              <method bean="aggregationStrategy" method="isAggregationComplete"/>
              <bean ref="dsnMessageProcessor"/>
              <bean ref="dsnSender"/>  

Notice the beans and methods in the route definition. These beans are declared in the Spring XML file in the same way as other Spring beans.

Also notice the 'choice' element. The components below the completionTimeout element are where the aggregeted message is routed after the completion or timeout condition is met. For the purposes of the route above, the aggregated message is routed to a Camel 'choice' component that determines if a failure notification should be generated. If all notification messages have been received, then processing stops as noted by the 'stop' element. Otherwise, the message is routed to the dsnMessageProcessor to create the failure notification, and then the dsnSender.

Monitor Client

So how do messages actually get into the monitoring service. The direct-common library defines a set of monitoring data structure and an client interface. It also provides a message parser that converts Mime messages into a structure of monitored attributes. Lastly it provides an implementation of the client interface using RESTful calls to the monitoring service. This implies that the monitoring service is not actually deployed as part of the gateway application. Generally the monitoring service is deployed as a centralized service in an HTTP capable container such as the Apache Tomcat web server.

As messages flow through the messaging gateway, the gateway utilizes the messaging client to feed messages and notifications into the monitoring service.

Previous: Up: Developers GuideNext: